Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy

Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy In this book Bernard Williams delivers a sustained indictment of moral theory from Kant onward His goal is nothing less than to reorient ethics toward the individual He deals with the most thorny ques

  • Title: Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy
  • Author: Bernard Williams
  • ISBN: 9780674268586
  • Page: 368
  • Format: Paperback
  • In this book Bernard Williams delivers a sustained indictment of moral theory from Kant onward His goal is nothing less than to reorient ethics toward the individual He deals with the most thorny questions in contemporary philosophy and offers new ideas about issues such as relativism, objectivity, and the possibility of ethical knowledge.

    • ↠ Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy || Ë PDF Read by ↠ Bernard Williams
      368 Bernard Williams
    • thumbnail Title: ↠ Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy || Ë PDF Read by ↠ Bernard Williams
      Posted by:Bernard Williams
      Published :2019-01-05T18:59:21+00:00

    One thought on “Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy”

    1. ok, i didn't read it in one weekend-- in fact, i took two, and all of the days in the middle, and just a little of this morning. whew. here's what i've got to say:bernard williams wrote beautiful beautiful books of philosophy. human books. books of ecumenical sweep. he addressed himself to the central questions in analytic ethics, but avoided falling victim to the myopia endemic to the analytic project. and he managed, in addition, this most extraordinary thing (really, i've found nothing to mat [...]

    2. This 1985 survey of modern ethics comes to us from a provost at Kings College, Cambridge. Bernard Williams raises an ancient concept, “virtue,” as an alternative to what he considers today's implausible, impersonal systems of morality, which have been built up by philosophers such as Kant.The first chapters look back at the Greek ideas of virtue. Middle chapters look at modern morality as an institution; the author highlights the many faults in this public morality. Final chapters look at al [...]

    3. This is an interesting book in which Williams makes some profound and deep observations, not just about ethics but, as the title implies, about the ability of philosophy to understand, create or comment on ethics. In the end I got a lot from it, but it does have one very major flaw. Williams has a flowery style of writing that make some sections impenetrable until you have read them several times. His habit of writing elongated sentences with lots of sub clauses can make it difficult to follow a [...]

    4. Although he treats certain historical positions quite shallowly, this book is a joy to read (and reread). I think any secular person who wants to take "morality" seriously (Kantians, utilitarians, I'm lookin at you!) will need to deal with the objections raised by this book.

    5. Williams has completely destroyed my conception of morality, as having some fundamental service to an ethical life. Throughout this heavily analytical work, Williams offers critiques of objective foundations for ethical theories; criticizing in particular the works of Kant, Mill and Aristotle. Williams' project in this one is to reorient our new way of life - permeated by technology, cultural differences and serious self-awareness - to the ancient ways of thinking about ethics, epitomized in Soc [...]

    6. Overrated. Misunderstood by those who feel like he's at least contributing to the debate. Funny at times. Though, again, misunderstood as to where and when he's kidding or poking fun at a theme or a philosopher. The distinction is crucial. I suppose he owes his readership to those willing to read their own viewpoint between the lines. Which is possible.He could have taken the normative/morality distinction and ran with it some further instead of tweaking it and hollowing out words, rendering us [...]

    7. Don't let my 'low' score mislead you. Relatively seen, it is a very high score. I normally don't like works which are qualified as 'analytic philosophy' (or as you can put it: most of the philosophical works from the Anglosphere). Bernard Williams seems to break that habit of mine.His work might , however, not be as clear as he was hoping it would (A. W. Moore confirms this in his commentary on the text), but nevertheless he made some very good points.I really appriciated his vision on - as the [...]

    8. Phenomenal work by one of the twentieth century's great moral philosophers. I can't recommend this work enough to students of moral and political philosophy. Williams's elusive style, by which his arguments are elaborated gradually and key passages seem to come out of nowhere, is maddening for the casual reader; I would absolutely not recommend this book to non-specialists. This work is an intervention into several deep debates within contemporary moral philosophy, a grasp of which is probably n [...]

    9. I can't remember the last time a book made me feel too stupid to be reading it - this one did. A.W. Moore said it well in the "Commentary on the Text" that appears in the back of the Routledge Classics (2011) edition: "It has a kind of clarity. But it does not have the kind of clarity that makes for easy reading. Williams never belabors the obvious; and he rarely makes explicit what he takes to be implicit in something he has already said. His writing is therefore extremely dense. It leaves an e [...]

    10. Williams' Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy is a deceptively easy read. There is a great deal going on in Williams' book, and a great deal that is positive. His critique of 'morality' and the notion of obligation is forceful, and his separation of 'ethics' from 'morality' is prudent and well formed. Ultimately though, Williams position leaves one in a difficult position. His focus on deliberative priority, and first person decision making fails to question how/why certain individuals deliberat [...]

    11. Bernard William gets at the core of the issue, while still covering the basics of both utilitarian and relativist thoughts. His thesis is skepticism that there can be a universal basis for ethics, but that the arguments most commonly involved do form the basis for each individual to adopt a consistent approach. He also separates ethics from morals, for which the latter usually assumes some basis of tradition or collectivism and carries some degree of obligation. I especially enjoyed his introduc [...]

    12. This is so close to being really, really good, but then he drops the ball. Consistently. Still one of the best books in Anglo-American ethics written over the past 30 years. (Trying to imagine what else should be on that list is a depressing thought.)

    13. A singular and intriguing approach to the philosophy of ethics. Lots of powerful insights, but a bit too cleverly written.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *